Legal Opinion

Quesenberry v. Meginniss

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided February 11, 1987No. 814Published

1Opinion of the Court

WILNER, Judge.

This proceeding began as an action to quiet title to a right of sepulture. None of the parties much cares whether technically that is a proper form of action, considering that the right of sepulture at issue here, according to statute, “shall not be considered property”; they simply want to know who among them is entitled to control burials in a certain crypt at Druid Ridge Cemetery.

*322In 1922, Esther R. Meginniss purchased cemetery Lot 703 from the Druid Ridge Cemetery Company. At some point, she built a private mausoleum on the lot, containing, we are told, six burial spaces, two…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Matter of Currier (Woodlawn Cemetery)New York Court of Appeals · 1949
  2. Redwood v. HowisonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1917
  3. Livingston v. Safe Deposit & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1929
  4. Stewart v. WhitehurstCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
  5. Evergreen Cemetery Ass'n v. JurgensenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API