Quesenberry v. Meginniss
Court of Special Appeals of Maryland
1Opinion of the Court
WILNER, Judge.
This proceeding began as an action to quiet title to a right of sepulture. None of the parties much cares whether technically that is a proper form of action, considering that the right of sepulture at issue here, according to statute, “shall not be considered property”; they simply want to know who among them is entitled to control burials in a certain crypt at Druid Ridge Cemetery.
*322In 1922, Esther R. Meginniss purchased cemetery Lot 703 from the Druid Ridge Cemetery Company. At some point, she built a private mausoleum on the lot, containing, we are told, six burial spaces, two…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Matter of Currier (Woodlawn Cemetery)New York Court of Appeals · 1949
- Redwood v. HowisonCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1917
- Livingston v. Safe Deposit & Trust Co.Court of Appeals of Maryland · 1929
- Stewart v. WhitehurstCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1973
- Evergreen Cemetery Ass'n v. JurgensenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1970
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.