Legal Opinion

Bishay v. United States

United States Court of Federal Claims

Decided September 16, 2019No. 18-1665Unpublished

1Opinion of the Court

3Jn tbc Wnitcb ~tatcs Qtourt of §cbcral ~Iaims (Pro Se) No. #18-1665C (Filed: September 16, 2019 I Not for Publication) ) BAHIG F. BISHAY, ) ) Keywords: I.RC. § 6672; Token Plaintiff, ) Payment; Tax Refund; Motion to Dismiss; ) Subject-Matter Jurisdiction; Pro Se V. ) ) THE UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ) Received • USCFC ) ~ Defendant. SEP 16 2019 _ _________ _ _____ ) Bahig F. Bishay, Norwood, MA, pro se. Courtney M Hutson, Trial Attorney, U.S. Depai1ment of Justice, Tax Division, Court of Federal Claims Section, Washington, D.C., with whom were Richard E. Zuckerman, Principal Deputy Assistant…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Haines v. KernerSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Adkins v. E. I. DuPont De Nemours & Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
  3. Fisher v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2005
  4. Jan's Helicopter Service, Inc. v. Federal Aviation AdministrationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2008
  5. Trusted Integration, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2011

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API