Legal Opinion

Wall v. Malarkey

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided January 15, 1969PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtO’Connell, J.

This is an appeal from a decree denying plaintiff, Mary Malarkey Wall, compensation claimed for services as a co-executor of the estate of Fannie Emma Malarkey and also denying any amount for the services of an attorney employed by her in connection with matters relating to the estate.

Plaintiff and defendants, all children of the decedent, were named as executors in decedent’s will. Plaintiff refused to join with defendants in a petition *263for the appointment of the three of them as eo-exeeutors, it being her opinion that the will offered for probate did not represent her mother’s dispositive…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Estate of ScottCalifornia Court of Appeal · 1905

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Matter of Estate of StephensCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1978

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API