Legal Opinion
Mondry v. American Family Mutual Insurance
Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit
Decided November 28, 2012No. Nos. 10-3409, 11-1750PublishedCited by 4 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
In these consolidated appeals, Sharon Mondry challenges both the damages and the fees awarded to her in this suit filed under the Employee Retirement Income Security Act (“ERISA”), 29 U.S.C. § 1132. Finding no clear error or abuse of discretion in any of the district court’s determinations, we affirm.
I
Mondry worked for American Family Mutual Insurance Company (“American Family”) until September 2003. She participated in the AmeriPreferred PPO Plan (the “Plan”), a self-funded group health plan that American Family offered to its employees. During the time period relevant to this…
2Cases cited36 opinions
- Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
- Hardt v. Reliance Standard Life Insurance Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 2010
- Norman E. Coleman v. Commissioner of Internal Revenue, Gary Holder v. Secretary of the Treasury and United States of AmericaCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1986
- Pickett v. Sheridan Health Care CenterCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2011
- Mary Nell Little v. Cox's SupermarketsCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1995
31 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by4 opinions
- Hartman v. Dana Holding Corp.District Court, N.D. Indiana · 2013
- Bustetter v. CEVA Logistics U.S., Inc.District Court, E.D. Kentucky · 2019
- Griffin v. TeamcareDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019
- Griffin v. Teamcare, a Central States Health PlanDistrict Court, N.D. Illinois · 2019