Legal Opinion
Storage Technology Corp. v. Quantum Corp.
District Court, D. Colorado
Decided May 17, 2005No. CIV.A. 03M672PublishedCited by 2 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
FINDINGS, CONCLUSIONS AND ORDER DENYING PLAINTIFF’S MOTION FOR PRELIMINARY INJUNCTION
MATSCH, Senior District Judge.
Plaintiff Storage Technology Corporation (“StorageTek”) is the owner of U.S. Patent No. 6,549,363, issued April 15, 2003 (“the ’363 patent”). By its motion for preliminary injunction, StorageTek seeks to enjoin defendant Quantum Corporation (“Quantum”) from selling magnetic tape cartridges identified as SDLT I and II on the ground that the magnetic tape component of those cartridges infringes Claim 1 of the ’363 patent. The ’363 patent relates to magnetic tape used for the…
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Graham v. John Deere Co. of Kansas CitySupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Vitronics Corporation v. Conceptronic, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1996
- Texas Digital Systems, Inc. v. Telegenix, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2002
- Johnson Worldwide Associates, Inc. v. Zebco Corporation and Brunswick CorporationCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1999
- H.H. Robertson, Company v. United Steel Deck, Inc. And Nicholas J. Bouras, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 1987
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Acoustic Marketing Research, Inc. v. TECHNICS, LLC.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2008
- Acoustic Marketing Research, Inc. v. TECHNICS, LLC.Supreme Court of Colorado · 2008