Legal Opinion · Dissent

United States ex rel. Woodard v. Tynan

Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit

Decided March 21, 1985No. 83-1931Published

1DissentMcWILLIAMS, Circuit Judge

I must respectfully dissent. The result reached by the majority opinion points toward an unwarranted intrusion by the federal judiciary into a state court proceeding. I take no exception to section I of the majority opinion, which is simply a recital of background material. However, I respectfully disagree with sections II and III, and would decide as follows on the three matters urged by the appellant as error.

As the majority opinion states, the only issue in the case is whether the district court abused its discretion. By arguing that the federal district court abused its discretion, the…

2Cases cited10 opinions

  1. Link v. Wabash RailroadSupreme Court of the United States · 1962
  2. Allen v. McCurrySupreme Court of the United States · 1980
  3. Atlantic Coast Line Railroad v. Brotherhood of Locomotive EngineersSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  4. Douglas Oil Co. of Cal. v. Petrol Stops NorthwestSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
  5. Harrington v. DeVitoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1981

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API