Marriage of Spangler v. Spangler

Upon a careful review of the record in this case, we cannot afford the appellant any substantial relief from the judgment he deems oppressive. While we may disagree with the generosity of the awards made and the denial of the special equity, we cannot reverse the judgment. See Canakaris v. Canakaris, 382 So.2d 1197 (Fla.1980); Walter v. Walter, 464 So.2d 538 (Fla.1985).

We do find error, though, in the requirement that appellant have appellee covered under his employer's health insurance policy, or provide an alternative “approved by” appellee. We were informed by the parties that the…