Legal Opinion

Jarman v. Efficient Electric

District Court, D. Arizona

Decided May 14, 2021No. 2:18-cv-00526Unknown

1Opinion

1 WO 2 3 4 5 6 IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT 7 FOR THE DISTRICT OF ARIZONA 8 9 Greg Jarman, No. CV-18-00526-PHX-SMB 10 Plaintiff, ORDER 11 v. 12 American Family Insurance Company, 13 Defendant. 14 15 Pending before the Court is Plaintiff Greg Jarman’s Motion for Attorneys’ Fees, 16 Non-Taxable Expenses, and Pre- and Post-Judgment Interest. (Doc. 219.) Defendant, 17 American Family Insurance Company (“American Family”), responded, (Doc. 224), and 18 Plaintiff replied. (Doc. 227.) The Court has considered the pleadings and attached exhibits 19 and now issues this order granting in part…

2Cases cited20 opinions

  1. Hensley v. EckerhartSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Blum v. StensonSupreme Court of the United States · 1984
  3. Pennsylvania v. Delaware Valley Citizens' Council for Clean AirSupreme Court of the United States · 1986
  4. Missouri v. Jenkins Ex Rel. AgyeiSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
  5. Gates v. DeukmejianCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1992

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API