Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re Cortigene

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided February 14, 2014No. Nos. 2013-B-2022, 2013-B-2172Published

1DissentKnoll, J.

hi agree with the majority that clear and convincing evidence clearly shows Mr. Schwartz not only knowingly engaged in the unauthorized practice of law in Louisiana, but also acted with deceit. In my view, this intentional and indefensible conduct merits the harshest of sanctions, thus I disagree with the sanction imposed by the majority.

As the majority astutely noted, we have consistently found the unauthorized practice of law very serious, felonious misconduct and even grounds for permanent disbarment. In re: Lindsay, 07-1813 (La.3/7/08), 976 So.2d 1261; In re: Patrick, 07-1222…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. In re JeffersonSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2004
  2. In Re LindsaySupreme Court of Louisiana · 2008
  3. In Re PatrickSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2007
  4. In re CallahanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
  5. Gibsland Bank and Trust Company v. Kitchens Benton Kitchens & Black (Aplc)Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2012

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API