Legal Opinion
Santana v. Danco Inc.
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided March 20, 2014PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, Bronx County (Julia I. Rodriguez, J), entered on or about June 25, 2013, which, to the extent appealed from, denied plaintiffs motion for partial summary judgment on the issue of liability, unanimously modified, on the law, the motion granted as against defendants Danco Inc. and Milan Racan, and otherwise affirmed, without costs.
It is well settled that when a rear-end collision occurs, “the driver of the front vehicle is entitled to summary judgment on liability, unless the driver of the following vehicle can provide a nonnegligent explanation for the collision” (Santana…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Santana v. Tic-Tak Limo Corp.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
- Voskin v. LemelAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Soto-Maroquin v. MelletAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2009
3Cited by9 opinions
- Reyes v. Se ParkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2015
- Vasquez v. StricklandAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- Betances v. DJB Intl. LtdAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
- McCarthy v. Art Van Lines USA Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2016
- Goodman v. IEH Auto Parts, LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2022
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.