State v. George Anthony W.
West Virginia Supreme Court
1DissentWorkman, Justice
The result reached by the majority is patently absurd. It has stretched the intent of the juvenile procedural protections to the point of shattering. The complexity of this matter has been exaggerated, and the entire predicament boils down to one simple question: were the confessions of these two juveniles legally obtained? The lower court held, quite properly in my view, that they were. A majority of this Court disagreed.
I. Prompt Presentment
The factual recitation undertaken by the majority is quite thorough; its interpretation of those facts, however, is profoundly flawed. The essence of…
2Cases cited20 opinions
- Miranda v. ArizonaSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- In Re GAULTSupreme Court of the United States · 1967
- Kent v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1966
- Breed v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1975
- State v. PersingerWest Virginia Supreme Court · 1982
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.