Roller Derby Associates v. Seltzer
District Court, N.D. Illinois
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM OPINION
TONE, District Judge.
Named as plaintiffs in this removed action are a partnership and one of the partners. Defendants are the two other surviving partners and two other parties. Viewed in the light most favorable to plaintiffs, the complaint, in Count I, seeks dissolution of the partnership on the ground of breaches of fiduciary duty by one of the defendant partners and, in Count II, asserts a claim against the non-partner defendants for breaches of obligations due the partnership.
Defendants have filed a motion for more definite statement, which is denied, and to strike…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Sindelare v. WalkerIllinois Supreme Court · 1891
- Ives v. MuhlenburgAppellate Court of Illinois · 1907
3Cited by6 opinions
- Myers v. American Dental Ass'nCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1982
- Gross v. FranklinDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
- Myers v. American Dental AssociationCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1983
- Consolidated Rail Corp. v. Grand Trunk Western RailroadDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1984
- Chicago Heights Venture v. Dynamit Nobel of America, Inc.District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1983
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.