Johnson v. State
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
HORSEY, Justice:
We are asked to determine whether the Department of Correction’s retroactive application of our decision in Richmond v. State, Del.Supr., 446 A.2d 1091 (1982) operates as an increase in punishment violating the Ex Post Facto Clause or the Fourteenth Amendment Due Process Clause of the Federal Constitution. We hold that in the interest of fundamental fairness, the State’s unilateral application of Richmond retrospectively to eliminate accrued “good time credits” constitutes an “ex post facto -like” violation of defendants’ Fourteenth Amendment rights to due process.
I
Defendants…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Weaver v. GrahamSupreme Court of the United States · 1981
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
- Calder v. BullSupreme Court of the United States · 1798
- Bouie v. City of ColumbiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Marks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1977
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by3 opinions
- State v. LeCompteSupreme Court of Delaware · 1988
- State v. BezarezSuperior Court of Delaware · 2020
- Woulard v. RedmanDistrict Court, D. Delaware · 1984