Brush v. Holland
New York Surrogate's Court
1Opinion of the Court
The Surrogate.
A contest having arisen on the probate of the will of the deceased, the contestants seek to introduce *241proof of the declarations of the decedent’s widow, to show incapacity and the exercise of undue influence. The widow is named as a legatee in the will and also as executrix, and she propounds the instrument for proof. The probate of a will, is a proceeding of a mixed character, being as to the subject matter a proceeding in rem, and as to the persons interested, lis inter partes. Consequently none of the parties are competent witnesses. (Arnold v. Earle, 2 Lee’s Cases, p. 380.)…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- Osgood v. President & Directors of the Manhattan Co.New York Supreme Court · 1824
3Cited by12 opinions
- In Re Proving the Last Will & Testament of KennedyNew York Court of Appeals · 1901
- Beaubien v. CicotteMichigan Supreme Court · 1864
- In Re the Revocation of the Probate of the Will of MyerNew York Court of Appeals · 1906
- La Bau v. VanderbiltNew York Surrogate's Court · 1879
- In re Proving the Last Will & Testament of WheelerNew York Surrogate's Court · 1893
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.