Hall v. State
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the CourtHart, J.
J. T. Hall prosecutes; this appeal to reverse a. judgment of conviction against.him for the crime of possessing an automobile tire upon, which the numbers had been mutilated.
It is .insisted by counsel for- the defendant that the : court erred- in instructing the jury that, if the defendant kept the automobile tire in his possession .after-he knew that the serial number had been mutilated so that.it could not be read, he would be guilty. The indictment was returned under § 7437. of Crawford & Moses’ Digest, which reads as follows: “It shall be unlawful for any person, firm or corporation to…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- State v. DavidSupreme Court of Missouri · 1895
- People v. FernowIllinois Supreme Court · 1919
- Caldwell v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1901
- Miller v. JonesSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1877
- Morrison v. PorterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1886
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by5 opinions
- State v. TaylorArizona Supreme Court · 1965
- Star Square Auto Supply Co. v. GerkSupreme Court of Missouri · 1930
- State v. DavisIdaho Supreme Court · 1951
- Baker v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1928
- State v. DavisIdaho Supreme Court · 1951