Legal Opinion

Benedict v. State

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided July 27, 2004No. WD 63165PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RONALD R. HOLLIGER, Judge.

Richard Benedict sought reversal of his convictions for first-degree murder, section 565.020, RSMo 2000, 1 and armed criminal action, section 571.015, by filing a Rule 29.15 motion alleging ineffective assistance of his trial counsel. Benedict appeals the court’s denial of his motion claiming that the judgment did not contain sufficient findings of fact and conclusions of law as required by Rule 29.150. Because we find that the motion court did not include findings of fact and conclusions of law on all issues presented to it, we vacate the judgment and remand.

Facts…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Smith v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  2. Blackmon v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2003
  3. Shelton v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004
  4. State v. BenedictMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Bode v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2010
  2. Taylor v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API