Legal Opinion

Carol Sparks Drake v. Thomas A. Dickey, Craig Anderson, Charles E. Podell, and Duke Realty Corporation

Indiana Court of Appeals

Decided December 11, 2013No. 29A02-1302-CT-152PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

NAJAM, Judge.

STATEMENT OF THE CASE

Carol Sparks Drake appeals the trial court's entry of summary judgment for Thomas A. Dickey, Craig Anderson, Charles E. Podell, and Duke Realty Corporation (collectively, "Duke Realty") on Drake's claim that Duke Realty intentionally interfered with her partnership agreement with the law firm of Parr Richey Obremskey & Morton ("Parr Richey"). 1 Drake and Duke Realty raise three issues 2 for our review, which we consolidate and restate as follows:

1. Whether there is a genuine issue of material fact as to whether Duke Realty intentionally induced Parr…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Winkler v. V.G. Reed & Sons, Inc.Indiana Supreme Court · 1994
  2. Dreaded, Inc. v. St. Paul Guardian Insurance Co.Indiana Supreme Court · 2009
  3. Levee v. BeechingIndiana Court of Appeals · 2000
  4. Bochnowski v. Peoples Federal Savings & Loan Ass'nIndiana Supreme Court · 1991
  5. Recker v. Review Bd. of the Ind. Dep't of Workforce DevelopmentIndiana Supreme Court · 2011

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dawn Duty v. Boys and Girls Club of Porter County and Chuck LeerIndiana Court of Appeals · 2014
  2. Jack Sheets v. David Birky, Interra Credit Union, Curt Bechler, and Venture International, LLC.Indiana Court of Appeals · 2016
  3. Carol Sparks Drake v. Thomas A. Dickey, Craig Anderson, Charles E. Podell, and Duke Realty Corp.Indiana Supreme Court · 2014
  4. ALEXANDER v. CVS PHARMACY, INC.District Court, S.D. Indiana · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API