Legal Opinion

American Hatters & Furriers Co. v. United States

United States Customs Court

Decided August 11, 1938PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Cline, Judge:

In this suit against the United States the plaintiff claims that the collector of customs at the port of New York assessed additional duty illegally at the rate of 10 per centum ad valorem under section 304 (b) of the Tariff Act of 1930 on the ground that the merchandise was not legally marked when imported.

It appears from the record that the importation consisted of raw rabbit skins, a product of Poland, and that the same were packed in old second-hand burlap bags which were dirty and some of them stained from the fat running out of the skins; that the skins were not required to…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. American Burtonizing Co. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1926

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Protest 1985-K of E. M. Sergeant Pulp & Chemical Co.United States Customs Court · 1943
  2. Protest 22505-K of Ossola Bros.United States Customs Court · 1940
  3. Protest 46593-K of R. F. Revson Co.United States Customs Court · 1942
  4. Protest 707494-G of Sheffield MillsUnited States Customs Court · 1943
  5. Protest 803289-G of NeumanUnited States Customs Court · 1943

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API