Legal Opinion

Vojtech Blau, Inc. v. Sara

New York Supreme Court

Decided February 7, 1994Published

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION OF THE COURT

Stephen G. Crane, J.

This motion for consolidation is denied. The cross motion for a joint trial is granted.

Action No. 1 is already the result of consolidation of two separate actions. Action No. 2, commenced as the Statute of Limitations period was ending, is the method its plaintiff used to draw in a party it had only just learned of in depositions in action No. 1.

These claims arise out of a single occurrence, a bursting pipe in the office of Lloyd Sara, D.D.S., causing property damage to merchandise and other property owned by Vojtech Blau, Inc. (VBI). VBI was insured…

2Cases cited19 opinions

  1. Connell v. HaydenAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  2. Brock v. BuaAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1981
  3. Mondello v. New York Blood CenterNew York Court of Appeals · 1992
  4. Duffy v. Horton Memorial HospitalNew York Court of Appeals · 1985
  5. Raschel v. RishNew York Court of Appeals · 1986

14 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API