Legal Opinion

Columbus and Mae Frances Crenshaw v. Great Central Insurance Co., a Corporation

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided August 24, 1973No. 72-1747PublishedCited by 21 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VAN OOSTERHOUT, Senior Circuit Judge.

This is a timely appeal from an order of the District Court sustaining defendant Great Central Insurance Co.’s motion to dismiss Count I of plaintiffs’ first amended petition in an action for wrongful death pursuant to a policy of insurance affording uninsured motorist coverage. The motion was sustained on the basis that the Count I claim was barred by the Missouri statute of limitations for wrongful death. See V.A.M.S. § 537.100.

Plaintiffs in the original petition, as well as in the amended petition, are Columbus and Mae Frances Crenshaw, Gretschen…

2Cases cited11 opinions

  1. Saint Paul Mercury Indemnity Co. v. Red Cab Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Thomson v. GaskillSupreme Court of the United States · 1942
  3. Horton v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1961
  4. Clark v. Paul Gray, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1939
  5. Nelson v. KeeferCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by21 opinions

  1. Travelers Property Casualty v. GoodCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2012
  2. Schubert v. Auto Owners InsuranceCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2011
  3. Bor-Son Building Corporation v. Keith R. HellerCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
  4. United Services Automobile Association v. WerleyAlaska Supreme Court · 1974
  5. Frances Louise Ross v. Inter-Ocean Insurance CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1982

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API