Legal Opinion
People v. Gephart
California Court of Appeal
Decided June 12, 1979No. Crim. 8793PublishedCited by 33 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Opinion
REYNOSO, J.
A jury found defendants Gephart, Grossen and Hryn guilty of the crime of armed robbery in violation of Penal Code section 211.
Defendants assert that the Siskiyou County Superior Court erred when it determined that a prior order of another court, the Stanislaus County Superior Court, granting a motion under Penal Code section 1538.5 suppressing evidence, was not binding as to the same evidence as it relates to different charges filed in Siskiyou County. Consequently, they argue that the court erred in failing to suppress the evidence in the Siskiyou County proceeding.
The…
2Cases cited27 opinions
- Bernhard v. Bank of America National Trust & Saving AssociationCalifornia Supreme Court · 1942
- People v. WilsonCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
- People v. TaylorCalifornia Supreme Court · 1974
- People v. StegerCalifornia Supreme Court · 1976
- People v. GaleCalifornia Supreme Court · 1973
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by33 opinions
- People v. LaiwaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1983
- Ayers v. City of RichmondCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1990
- Schmidlin v. City of Palo AltoCalifornia Court of Appeal · 2008
- Dr. Robert Heath v. Douglas Cast, Robert Hardy, Joseph Brown and Peter PerrinCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1987
- Schlick v. Superior CourtCalifornia Supreme Court · 1992
28 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.