Ransopher v. Chapman
Supreme Court of Arkansas
1Opinion of the Court
David Newbern, Justice.
This is a defamation case. We have no public figure plaintiff, no “media” defendant, and no matter of “public concern, ” thus we will be able, for the most part, to avoid the First Amendment quagmire exemplified in New York Times v. Sullivan, 376 U.S. 254 (1964); Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc., 418 U.S. 323 (1974); and Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. Greenmoss Builders, Inc., 472 U.S. 749 (1985). John Ransopher, a building contractor, presented evidence that Norman Chapman, a person for whom Ransopher was constructing a residence, called Ransopher a liar and a cheat. The…
2Cases cited10 opinions
- New York Times Co. v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1964
- Gertz v. Robert Welch, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1974
- Dun & Bradstreet, Inc. v. Greenmoss Builders, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1985
- A. D. Luster, A's Fishhouses, Inc. v. Retail Credit CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1978
- Little Rock Newspapers, Inc. v. DodrillSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1983
5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- United Insurance Co. of America v. MurphySupreme Court of Arkansas · 1998
- Milam v. Bank of CabotSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- Minor v. FaillaSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1997
- Mitchell v. Globe International Publishing, Inc.District Court, W.D. Arkansas · 1991
- Integon Indemnity Corp. v. BullSupreme Court of Arkansas · 1992
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.