In Re Estate of Hirsch
Ohio Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtWeygandt, C. J.
At the threshold of this discussion it should be observed that this case involves no question of priority among creditors who have filed claims in the. Ohio court. Counsel agree that the single question presented, for consideration below and here is whether the Ohio court should have used all available Ohio assets for the sole purpose of paying all unsecured claims allowed by the Ohio court. Or, was it error for the Ohio court to consider, as well, the available Missouri assets and the unsecured claims allowed by the Missouri court?
The Court of Probate and the Court of Appeals were in…
2Cited by4 opinions
- Troutman v. Estate of TroutmanOhio Court of Appeals · 2010
- Estate of Earley, Unpublished Decision (8-24-2001)Ohio Court of Appeals · 2001
- Hilliard v. ColclazierSupreme Court of Colorado · 1950
- In Re Estate of RaduOhio Court of Appeals · 1973