Legal Opinion

Warten v. Caguas Central Federal Savings Bank of Puerto Rico

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided September 25, 1990No. Nos. 90-761, 90-798PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Per curiam

The temporary injunction under review is affirmed upon a holding that: (1) Fla.R. Civ.P. 1.610(a) was not, as urged, applicable to this case because the subject temporary injunction was issued with notice to the defendants below, namely, the defendants’ counsel, and the order under review otherwise fully complies with Fla.R.Civ.P. 1.610(c) in that it states the reasons for its entry; (2) the trial court did not abuse its discretion in entering the temporary injunction under review after impleading the defendants in supplementary proceedings to execute on an unsatisfied judgment because (a)…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. United States Fire Ins. Co. v. MorejonDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1976
  2. Richard v. McNairSupreme Court of Florida · 1935
  3. General Guaranty Insurance Co. of Fla. v. DaCostaDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  4. Banco Indus. De Venezuela, CA v. Mederos SuarezDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1989
  5. Whigham v. MuehlDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. 17315 Collins Avenue, LLC v. Fortune Development Sales Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2010
  2. Varela v. American Alliance Trade Finance Service Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1999
  3. Zur v. DeganiDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1993

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API