Pinkerton & Laws, Inc. v. MacRo Construction, Inc.
Court of Appeals of Georgia
1Opinion of the Court
Blackburn, Judge.
Pinkerton & Laws, Inc. (P & L), a general contractor, entered into a contract with Macro Construction, Inc. (Macro), a subcontrac tor, for Macro to frame buildings for P & L on a certain construction project. Macro was bonded for this project by Amwest Surety Insurance Company (Amwest). Disputes arose under the construction contract, and P & L ultimately declared Macro in default. P & L then made a claim for payment under the bonds to Amwest. When Amwest refused the claim, this litigation ensued. At trial, the jury found in favor of P & L against Macro, but not against…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- City of Fairburn v. CookCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
- Krause v. VanceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
- Payne v. Jones & KolbCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
- Lofty v. FullerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
- C&S/Sovran Corp. v. First Federal Savings BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995
3Cited by4 opinions
- R. C. Acres, Inc. v. Cambridge Faire Properties, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
- Security Life Insurance v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
- R. C. Acres, Inc. v. Mommies Properties, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
- Security Life Insurance v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003