Legal Opinion

Pinkerton & Laws, Inc. v. MacRo Construction, Inc.

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided March 18, 1997No. A97A0712PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Blackburn, Judge.

Pinkerton & Laws, Inc. (P & L), a general contractor, entered into a contract with Macro Construction, Inc. (Macro), a subcontrac tor, for Macro to frame buildings for P & L on a certain construction project. Macro was bonded for this project by Amwest Surety Insurance Company (Amwest). Disputes arose under the construction contract, and P & L ultimately declared Macro in default. P & L then made a claim for payment under the bonds to Amwest. When Amwest refused the claim, this litigation ensued. At trial, the jury found in favor of P & L against Macro, but not against…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of Fairburn v. CookCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1988
  2. Krause v. VanceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1993
  3. Payne v. Jones & KolbCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  4. Lofty v. FullerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1996
  5. C&S/Sovran Corp. v. First Federal Savings BankSupreme Court of Georgia · 1995

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. R. C. Acres, Inc. v. Cambridge Faire Properties, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2015
  2. Security Life Insurance v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003
  3. R. C. Acres, Inc. v. Mommies Properties, LLCCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2016
  4. Security Life Insurance v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API