Legal Opinion

Vasquez v. State

Court of Appeals of Texas

Decided October 25, 1989No. 3-89-029-CRPublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Per curiam

A jury found appellant guilty of driving while intoxicated, second offense, and assessed punishment at incarceration for 120 days and a $300 fine. Tex.Rev.Civ.Stat. Ann. art. 6701i-l(d) (Supp.1989). On the jury’s recommendation, imposition of sentence was suspended and appellant was placed on probation for two years.

Appellant first complains that he was denied due process and due course of law because the judge who imposed sentence and set the conditions of probation was not the judge who presided at appellant’s trial. This contention is without merit. It is not improper for different judges…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Basaldua v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1977
  2. Cartwright v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1980
  3. Woods v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978
  4. Custard v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 5th District (Dallas)1987
  5. Love v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1986

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Chauncey v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 8th District (El Paso)1992
  2. Keith v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)1996
  3. Clifton Harris v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1993
  4. Linda Mae Lilly v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 3rd District (Austin)1998

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API