United States v. Leta Moore
Court of Appeals for the Third Circuit
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION OF THE COURT
2Per curiam
Our order seeking to put on the record facts as to Mrs. Leta Moore’s domicile and the domiciles of the injured members of her family, including her husband, at the time of the filing of the suit at bar and at the date judgment was entered by the District Court, 311 F.Supp. 984, against the appellant, United States, neither expressly nor by implication decides any relevant issue. The order is designed to procure what may prove to be essential information in respect to an issue of conflict of laws, i. e., what law governs the pending suit.1, 2 We do not say that we will…
3Cases cited12 opinions
- United States v. United States Gypsum Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1948
- United States v. Philadelphia National BankSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
- Hurn v. OurslerSupreme Court of the United States · 1933
- Dick v. New York Life InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1959
- Emery v. EmeryCalifornia Supreme Court · 1955
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
4Cited by3 opinions
- United States v. Henry A. Molt, JrCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Henry A. Molt, JrCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1978
- United States v. Leta MooreCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1971