Legal Opinion
Standard Oil Co. v. National Surety Co.
Mississippi Supreme Court
Decided March 29, 1926No. 25523PublishedCited by 15 opinions
1Opinion of the CourtSmite, C. J.
This is a suit by the appellant, under chapter 217, Laws of 1918, on the bond of Clark-Hunt Contracting Company on which the National Surety Company is surety, executed by it to the Pompey Lake Drainage District, to insure the “construction and completion,” of several ditches and canals for which it had contracted with the Pompey Lake Drainag’e District. One of the provisions of the contract entered into by the Clark-Hunt Contracting Company with the drainage district is:
“The contractor shall discharge all claims for work done and material furnished in the prosecution of the work, and shall,…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Houck v. Little River Drainage DistrictSupreme Court of the United States · 1915
- Gulf & S. I. R. v. BradleyMississippi Supreme Court · 1915
- People ex rel. Wetz v. HeplerIllinois Supreme Court · 1909
3Cited by15 opinions
- Key Constructors, Inc. v. H & M GAS CO.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1989
- McElrath & Rogers v. W. G. Kimmons & SonsMississippi Supreme Court · 1927
- Commander v. Board of Com'rsSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1942
- Tallahatchie Drainage Dist. No. 1 v. Yocona-Tallahatchie Drainage Dist. No. 1Mississippi Supreme Court · 1927
- United States Fidelity & Guaranty Co. v. Yazoo County Ex Rel. RingsMississippi Supreme Court · 1926
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.