Legal Opinion
Sinegal v. Lafayette Parish Sheriff's Office
Louisiana Court of Appeal
Decided May 7, 2014No. 13-1437PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
KEATY, Judge.
Bln this workers’ compensation case, the claimant appeals a judgment denying her motion for penalties and attorney fees. For the following reasons, we affirm.
FACTS AND PROCEDURAL HISTORY
The facts in this matter are not in dispute. On November 29, 2010, a consent judgment was signed by the workers’ compensation judge (WCA) wherein the parties stipulated that the claimant, Betty Sinegal, was injured on April 26, 2006, and December 12, 2007, in the course and scope of her employment with Defendant, the Lafayette Parish Sheriffs Department. The consent judgment, in relevant part,…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Everything on Wheels Subaru, Inc. v. Subaru South, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1993
- Williams v. Rush Masonry, Inc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1999
- Montalvo v. SondesSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1994
- Fontenot v. Reddell Vidrine Water Dist.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
- Ducote v. Louisiana Industries, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2008
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Sun Coast Contracting Services, Inc. v. Dien's Auto Salvage, Inc.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2014
- Bailey v. Veolia Envtl. Servs.Louisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
- James Crawford Bailey v. Veolia Environmental ServicesLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2018
- Lauryn Ruebush v. Office of Risk Management & the Care Center of DequincyLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
- Marcus Strother v. City of Marksville - Police DepartmentLouisiana Court of Appeal · 2015
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.