Legal Opinion

Porcelli v. PMA Associates

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 23, 2009PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the CourtKane, J.

Appeal from a decision of the Workers’ Compensation Board, filed June 22, 2007, which, among other things, precluded the written reports and testimony of claimant’s medical expert.

Claimant’s husband (hereinafter decedent) was employed as a printer for over 30 years by several different employers. Decedent died in 1998 as a result of respiratory failure. Claimant applied for workers’ compensation death benefits, claiming that decedent’s death was attributable to his inhalation of toxic chemicals during the course of his employment.

Following hearings, a Workers’ Compensation Law Judge…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Claim of Schwartz v. Hebrew Academy of the Five TownsAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
  2. Claim of Olczyk v. Verizon New York, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
  3. Claim of Barth v. Hanson Aggregates, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Matter of Barton v. Consolidated Edison Co. of New York, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2020

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API