State Farm Fire & Casualty Co. v. Mower
Texas Supreme Court
1Per curiam
The dispositive issue in this case is whether any evidence was adduced at trial to support the verdict that Ronald and Marilyn Mower’s home was so damaged by fire that it was a “total loss”, as that term is defined by law. A divided court of appeals held there was. 876 S.W.2d 914. We disagree.
The Mowers insured their home with State Farm Fire and Casualty Company for $175,-000. After it burned, State Farm hired an independent adjuster to investigate the loss. Only the foundation and about 85% of the garage remained. The adjuster concluded, before any repair estimates could be made, that the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Glens Falls Insurance Co. v. PetersTexas Supreme Court · 1965
- Royal Insurance Co. v. McIntyreTexas Supreme Court · 1896
- State Farm Lloyds v. MowerCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1993
3Cited by4 opinions
- Canal Insurance Co. v. Hopkins, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2007
- Canal Insurance Company v. Mark Hopkins D/B/A Hopkins Towing and Recovery, Texas Court of Appeals, 12th District (Tyler)2007
- Edgar Washington, Florence Hill, and Chrislyn Hill v. State Farm Mutual Automobile Insurance Company and Chrysler Capital LLC, Texas Court of Appeals, 2nd District (Fort Worth)2021
- State of Tennessee v. Christopher OgleCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 2019