Legal Opinion

David v. Anderson

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided March 27, 1899PublishedCited by 1 opinion

From Lane: J. C. Fullerton, Judge. Suit by Charles R. David against L. F. Anderson to compel a certain agreement to be carried out. Defendant appeals from a decree as prayed.

1Opinion of the CourtJustice Moore

This is a suit to enforce the specific performance of a contract of which the following is a copy: “Glenada, Oregon, April 25, 1893. State of Oregon, County of Douglas. This indenture witnesseth that Fred Anderson, party of the first part, of the state and county aforesaid, and Charles R. David, party of the second part, of the County of Lane and state aforesaid, agree to act and abide by the following articles of agreement: *440Fred Anderson, Ms heirs and assigns, agrees that Charles. R. David make the following payments, as described below. Then, on receipt of the- last payment, Fred Anderson…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Janney v. SleeperSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1883
  2. Sousely v. Burns's adm'rCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1873
  3. Hamilton v. CalhounSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1833

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Hawes v. TaylorOregon Supreme Court · 1967

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API