Cunningham v. Evansville & Terre Haute Railroad
Indiana Supreme Court
From the Knox Circuit Court.
1Opinion of the CourtHowk, J.
This is a suit by the appellants, James H. and James A. Cunningham, as plaintiffs, against the appellee, the Evansville and Terre Haute Eailroad Company, as sole de*479fendant. The object of the suit was to recover damages for' the destruction of the appellants’ starch and glucose works by fire, communicated thereto, as alleged, by and through the negligence of the appellee, and without any contributory negligence on the part of the appellants. The complaint of the appellants was in three paragraphs. In the first paragraph, appellants alleged that the appellee negligently failed to keep its…
2Cases cited9 opinions
- Connecticut Mutual Life Insurance v. New York & New Haven RailroadSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1856
- Sherlock v. AllingIndiana Supreme Court · 1873
- Ohio & Mississippi R. W. Co. v. DickersonIndiana Supreme Court · 1877
- Clark v. WilsonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1869
- Merrick v. BrainardNew York Supreme Court · 1860
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by17 opinions
- Pennsylvania Co. v. MarionIndiana Supreme Court · 1885
- Nashville, Chattanooga & Saint Louis Railway Co. v. MillerSupreme Court of Georgia · 1904
- Powers v. EllisIndiana Supreme Court · 1952
- Clark v. Peoples Saving & Loan Ass'nIndiana Supreme Court · 1943
- Dillon v. HuntSupreme Court of Missouri · 1891
12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.