Legal Opinion

State v. Stang

Court of Appeals of Georgia

Decided July 28, 1997No. A97A1361PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Pope, Presiding Judge.

The trial court granted defendant Steven Stang’s motion for discharge and acquittal after the State failed to comply with defendant’s speedy trial demand. See OCGA § 17-7-170. Concluding that defendant’s speedy trial demand was premature and therefore a nullity, we reverse.

On September 5, 1996, defendant was issued Uniform Traffic Citations (UTCs) for driving under the influence of alcohol and failing to maintain his lane. At about that time, defendant was required to post bond and notified that he should appear in court on December 5,1996. But the State did not file the…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. State v. GerbertSupreme Court of Georgia · 1996
  2. State v. LipskyCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1989
  3. Ghai v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1995
  4. Shire v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997
  5. Tyler v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1997

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Thomas v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1998
  2. Henderson v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2008
  3. Lagyak v. StateCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2000

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API