Nelson v. Chicago, B. & Q. Ry. Co.
South Dakota Supreme Court
1Opinion of the CourtGates, J.
Plaintiff recovered judgment against defendant for the value of grass, alfalfa, and hay alleged to have been 'burned by defendant’s locomtive engine. This appeal is froim the judgment and order denying new trial.
The evidence tended to show that shortly after appellant’s west-bound train from Hot Springs to Minnekahta went' past respondent’s land on the morning of October 4, 1921, smoke was seen arising from or near the right of way. It was seen by several persons, all of whom were some distance away. When the witnesses came to the burned tract it was discovered that quite a large area had…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Karsen v. Milwaukee & St. Paul Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1881
- Kelsey v. Chicago & North Western Railway Co.South Dakota Supreme Court · 1890
- Black v. Minneapolis & St. Louis RailroadSupreme Court of Iowa · 1903
- Farrell v. Minneapolis & Rainy River Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1913
- Babcock v. Canadian Northern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Minnesota · 1912
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by9 opinions
- State v. KietzkeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1971
- Friessen Const. Co., Inc. v. EricksonSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1976
- Holbert v. WermerskirchenSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1941
- State v. WatkinsSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1975
- State v. LapkeSouth Dakota Supreme Court · 1934
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.