Legal Opinion
In Re Alsted Automotive Warehouse, Inc.
United States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York
Decided January 29, 1982No. 1-19-40699PublishedCited by 27 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM
ROBERT JOHN HALL, Bankruptcy Judge.
Ford Motor Company (“Ford”) and Puro-lator, Inc., Filter Division (“Purolator”) move this Court for leave to file proofs of claim nunc pro tunc on the ground of substantial compliance with the provisions of Bankruptcy Rule 301. Leave is denied.
I
Ford and Purolator are prepetition creditors of Alsted Automotive Warehouse, Inc. (“Alsted”) against whom an order for relief under Chapter 7 of the Bankruptcy Code, 11 U.S.C. § 701 et seq. (Supp. Iv 1980), was entered on June 5, 1980. Ift due course, July 24, 1980 was scheduled as the date of the first…
2Cases cited8 opinions
- Hutchinson v. OtisSupreme Court of the United States · 1903
- Hoos & Co., Claimant-Appellant v. Dynamics Corporation of America, Debtor-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1978
- First Nat. Bank v. WestCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1915
- Sun Basin Lumber Co., Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1970
- Matter of HeywardUnited States Bankruptcy Court, E.D. New York · 1981
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by27 opinions
- Levine v. First National Bank of Lincolnwood (In Re Evanston Motor Co.)District Court, N.D. Illinois · 1983
- In Re McCoy Management Services, Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, W.D. Kentucky · 1984
- Associated Container Transportation (Australia) Ltd. v. Black & Geddes, Inc. (In Re Black & Geddes, Inc.)District Court, S.D. New York · 1983
- In Re Sems Music Co., Inc.United States Bankruptcy Court, M.D. Tennessee · 1982
- In Re ButterworthDistrict Court, W.D. Michigan · 1984
22 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.