Legal Opinion
Western Watersheds Project v. Matejko
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided July 24, 2006No. Nos. 05-35178, 05-35208PublishedCited by 11 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
ORDER
The opinion filed on July 24, 2006, slip opinion at 8183 [456 F.3d 922] and published at 456 F.3d 922 (9th Cir.2006) is amended as follows:
Page 8188 of the slip opinion [456 F.3d at 924], fourth line of the first full paragraph:
replace “Fish and Wildlife Service (FWS)” with “United States Forest Service”
Page 8188 of the slip opinion [456 F.3d at 924], footnote one:
replace “FWS” with “Forest Service”
Pages 8196-97 [456 F.3d at 928-929], footnote five:
Add “These post-decision amendments are not part of our review.” to the end of the footnote.
With these amendments, the panel has voted to…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Lujan v. National Wildlife FederationSupreme Court of the United States · 1990
- Norton v. Southern Utah Wilderness AllianceSupreme Court of the United States · 2004
- Utah Power & Light Co. v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1917
- California Oregon Power Co. v. Beaver Portland Cement Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1935
- Sierra Club v. BabbittCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1995
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by11 opinions
- Salix v. United States Forest ServiceDistrict Court, D. Montana · 2013
- Coalition for a Sustainable Delta v. Federal Emergency Management AgencyDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2011
- Conservation Force v. SalazarDistrict Court, District of Columbia · 2012
- Pine River Irrigation District v. United StatesDistrict Court, D. Colorado · 2009
- Hyatt v. PTOCourt of Appeals for the Federal Circuit · 2022
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.