Legal Opinion

Hagemeyer Trading Co. v. St. Paul Fire & Marine Ins.

Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit

Decided April 14, 1920No. Nos. 198, 199PublishedCited by 2 opinions

Appeals from the District Court of the United States for the Southern District of New York. Separate suits in admiralty by the Hagemeyer Trading Company and by Hugo A. Thomsen and another against the St. Paul Fire & Marine Insurance Company and on separate policies of marine insurance. Decrees for libelants, and respondent appeals.

1Opinion of the Court

MANTON, Circuit Judge.

The Santa Catharina left New York on July 25, 1914, bound for Rio de Janeiro. She carried cargoes which were insured by the appellant. She was a German steamship. Before reaching her port in South America, the recent war between Great Britain and Germany broke out on August 11th, she was seized as a prize by his majesty’s ship Glasgow in latitude 18° 30' and longitude west 38° 24'. The marine risks expressly assumed by the underwriter were against fire. The policies contained the usual clause, excepting loss or expenses arising from capture, seizure, restraint,…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Bird v. St. Paul Fire & Marine InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1918
  2. Muller v. Globe & Rutgers Fire Ins. of New YorkCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1917
  3. Brown v. . St. Nicholas Ins. Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1874
  4. Commercial Union Assur. Co. v. Pacific Union ClubCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1909
  5. Singleton v. Phenix InsuranceNew York Court of Appeals · 1892

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Western Assur. Co. of Toronto v. ShawCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1926
  2. Strom v. PetershagenDistrict Court, W.D. Washington · 2024

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API