Legal Opinion

Jackson v. Pittsford

Indiana Supreme Court

Decided November 23, 1846PublishedCited by 10 opinions

APPEAL from the Madison Circuit Court.

1Opinion of the CourtBlackford, J.

Assumpsit on a promissory note. Pitts-ford was the plaintiff below. Pleas, 1. Non assumpsit; 2. Usury. Replication in denial of the second plea. Verdict for the plaintiff. Motion by the defendants for a new trial overruled; and judgment on the verdict.

The first error assigned is, that the Court incorrectly allowed the plaintiff to challenge a juror.’ The following are the facts: After the plaintiff had challenged two jurors peremptorily, and their places had been supplied, he said he would take the jury. Some jurors challenged by the defendants being set aside, and others put in their places,…

Also in this document: Per curiam.

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. Beauchamp v. StateIndiana Supreme Court · 1842

3Cited by10 opinions

  1. Hamlyn v. NesbitIndiana Supreme Court · 1871
  2. Neff v. ReedIndiana Supreme Court · 1884
  3. Williams v. AllenIndiana Supreme Court · 1872
  4. Zehner v. KeplerIndiana Supreme Court · 1861
  5. Veach v. McDOWELLIndiana Court of Appeals · 1962

5 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API