Legal Opinion

Starbrite Waterproofing Co. v. Aim Construction & Contracting Corp.

District Court, S.D. New York

Decided February 20, 1996No. 95 Civ. 3447 (DC)PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*379 MEMORANDUM DECISION and ORDER

CHIN, District Judge.

Plaintiff Starbrite Waterproofing Co., Inc. (“Starbrite”) seeks sanctions against defendants Aim Construction Corp. (“ACC”), Aim Construction & Contractors Corp. (“ACCC”), and Seaboard Surety Company (“Seaboard”) pursuant to Rule 37 of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure for their purported failure to comply with their discovery obligations. Starbrite requests that the Court strike defendants’ answer and enter a default judgment for the amount requested in the complaint, together with interest, attorneys’ fees, and costs.

Because I find that…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. National Hockey League v. Metropolitan Hockey Club, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1976
  2. Clarence R. Valentine v. Museum of Modern ArtCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1994
  3. Update Art, Inc. v. Modiin Publishing, Ltd.Court of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1988

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. Starlight International Inc. v. HerlihyDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 1999
  2. Kindergartners Count, Inc. v. DeMoulinDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2002
  3. T & W Funding Co. XII, L.L.C. v. Pennant Rent-A-Car Midwest, Inc.District Court, D. Kansas · 2002
  4. AGI SureTrack, LLC v. OPISYSTEMS INC., INTEGRIS USA, LLC, SETH TACKETT, and ADAM WEISSDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2026
  5. Eagle v. USA Dent Company, LLCDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2023

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API