Legal Opinion
Crane Construction Co. v. Klaus Masonry
District Court, D. Kansas
Decided October 7, 1999No. Civ.A. 97-1502-MLBPublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
MEMORANDUM AND ORDER
BELOT, District Judge.
This matter is currently before the court on Klaus Masonry’s motion to dismiss (Doc. 112). In ruling on the motion, the court considered Klaus Masonry’s motion and supporting memorandum (Docs. 112 and 113), Crane Construction Company’s (Crane’s) response (Doc. 119), Klaus Masonry’s reply (Doc. 124), and Crane’s sur-reply (Doc. 131), 1 as well as the amended complaint itself (Doc. 2). Klaus Masonry seeks dismissal on the ground that it is not a legal entity and therefore, not subject to suit. A telephone conference call (the “conference”) was held with…
2Cases cited13 opinions
- Robert SWAIM, Plaintiff-Appellee, v. MOLTAN COMPANY, Defendant-AppellantCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1996
- 999, a Corporation, Plaintiff/appellee/cross-Appellant v. C.I.T. Corporation, a Corporation, Defendant/appellant/cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1985
- Lewis "Toby" Tyler v. City of Manhattan, United States of America, Amicus CuriaeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1997
- Morgan Guaranty Trust Company of New York v. Peter E. Blum, Peter E. BlumCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1981
- Bowers v. Du Page County Regional Board of School Trustees District No. 4Appellate Court of Illinois · 1989
8 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- Vorhees v. BaltazarSupreme Court of Kansas · 2007
- SMLL, L.L.C. v. Peak National BankColorado Court of Appeals · 2005
- Crane Construction Co. v. Klaus Masonry, LLCDistrict Court, D. Kansas · 2000
- GARY RAY ORTEGA v. LASIK VISION INSTITUTE, LLCDistrict Court, D. Utah · 2026
- Hayes v. County of YoloDistrict Court, E.D. California · 2024
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.