Legal Opinion · Dissent

Pettie v. State

Court of Special Appeals of Maryland

Decided March 11, 1987No. 803Published

1DissentRobert M. Bell, Judge

Evidence of the bias of a witness is always relevant. Davis v. Alaska, 415 U.S. 308, 316, 94 S.Ct. 1105, 1110, 39 L.Ed.2d 347 (1974); Waldron v. State, 62 Md.App. 686, 695-96, 491 A.2d 595 (1985); Biggs v. State, 56 Md.App. 638, 645-46, 468 A.2d 669 (1983), cert. denied, 299 Md. 425, 474 A.2d 218 (1984). Consequently, matters which tend to prove a witness’ bias may be the subject of cross-examination or extrinsic evidence as to such matters may be admissible to impeach the witness. Biggs, 56 Md.App. at 646, 468 A.2d 669. Recognizing that this is so, but, analogizing bias evidence to evidence…

2Cases cited15 opinions

  1. Wong Sun v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1963
  2. Davis v. AlaskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1974
  3. Earl E. Vick v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1954
  4. Trusty v. StateCourt of Appeals of Maryland · 1987
  5. State v. MurphyHawaii Supreme Court · 1978

10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API