Legal Opinion

Keeton v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided February 17, 1954No. 26833PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DAVIDSON, Commissioner.

This is a conviction for selling whisky in a dry area; the punishment, thirty days in jail.

The information charges only that appellant did, in a dry area, “sell whiskey.”

The name of the alleged purchaser is not stated, nor is there an allegation that the purchaser was unknown.

Such an information is fatally defective. Barnett v. State, 156 Tex.Cr.R. 396, 242 S.W.2d 885; Wilson v. State, Tex.Cr.App., 242 S.W.2d 886; Arts. 406 and 416, C.C.P.

The information being fatally defective, a conviction may not be predicated thereon.

The judgment is reversed and .the prosecution…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Pape v. Mid-America Preferred, Insurance Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1987
  2. Barnett v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1951
  3. Wilson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1951

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. King v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1956
  2. Bruce v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1981
  3. Treadgill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1956
  4. Threadgill v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1956
  5. Laury v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1974

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API