Legal Opinion

Taylor v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma

Decided March 17, 1939No. A-9344PublishedCited by 11 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtBarefoot, J.

The defendant was charged by information in Muskogee county, with the crime of forgery in the second degree, was tried, convicted and sentenced to serve a term of 3 years in the penitentiary, and has appealed.

It is contended by defendant that the evidence presented by the state is insufficient to sustain a conviction, and that the evidence does not show that defendant had knowledge that the check in question was forged.

Defendant was charged with a violation of section 2125, Okla. Stats. 1931, Okla. St. Ann. title 21, sec. 1577, which provides as follows:

“Every person who sells, exchanges or…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. State v. PeeplesWashington Supreme Court · 1912
  2. State v. HoblSupreme Court of Kansas · 1921
  3. Wells v. TerritoryCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1908
  4. Wilborn v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1923
  5. Dilbeck v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1929

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by11 opinions

  1. Milton v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the D.C. Circuit · 1940
  2. Boyer v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1939
  3. State v. MeeksSupreme Court of Iowa · 1954
  4. Hurley v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1966
  5. Smith v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Oklahoma · 1955

6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API