Legal Opinion

Scott v. Dyno Nobel, Inc.

District Court, E.D. Missouri

Decided September 1, 2022No. 4:16-cv-01440Unknown

1Opinion

UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT EASTERN DISTRICT OF MISSOURI EASTERN DIVISION TEDDY SCOTT, et al., ) ) Plaintiffs, ) ) v. ) Case No. 4:16CV1440 HEA ) DYNO NOBEL, INC., ) ) Defendant. ) OPINION, MEMORANDUM AND ORDER This matter is before the Court on Defendant Dyno Nobel’s Motion for New Trial Based on Legal and Evidentiary Errors [Doc. No. 474]. Plaintiffs oppose the Motion. For the reasons set forth below, the Motion will be denied. Background Plaintiff Teddy Scott (“Scott”), a worker at a neighboring facility, and his wife, Melanie Scott, brought this action against Defendant, a nitric acid…

2Cases cited31 opinions

  1. Allied Chemical Corp. v. Daiflon, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 1980
  2. Sherman v. Winco Fireworks, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2008
  3. Melvin White v. B. Jeffery Pence Natalee Schay, United States of America v. B. Jeffery Pence Natalee SchayCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
  4. Lopez v. Three Rivers Electric Cooperative, Inc.Supreme Court of Missouri · 2000
  5. Hale v. Firestone Tire & Rubber Co.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1985

26 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API