Legal Opinion

Davis v. Davis

Tennessee Supreme Court

Decided June 1, 1992PublishedCited by 69 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

DAUGHTREY, Justice.

This appeal presents a question of first impression, involving the disposition of the cryogenically-preserved product of in vitro fertilization (IVF), commonly referred to in the popular press and the legal journals as “frozen embryos.” The case began as a divorce action, filed by the appellee, Junior Lewis Davis, against his then wife, appellant Mary Sue Davis. The parties were able to agree upon all terms of dissolution, except one: who was to have “custody” of the seven “frozen embryos” stored in a Knoxville fertility clinic that had attempted to assist the…

2Cases cited26 opinions

  1. Illinois v. GatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1983
  2. Roe v. WadeSupreme Court of the United States · 1973
  3. Griswold v. ConnecticutSupreme Court of the United States · 1965
  4. Wisconsin v. YoderSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  5. Meyer v. NebraskaSupreme Court of the United States · 1923

21 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by69 opinions

  1. Michelle RYE Et Al. v. WOMEN’S CARE CENTER OF MEMPHIS, MPLLC Et Al.Tennessee Supreme Court · 2015
  2. State v. PendergrassCourt of Criminal Appeals of Tennessee · 1999
  3. Kass v. KassNew York Court of Appeals · 1998
  4. Tina Marie Hodge v. Chadwick CraigTennessee Supreme Court · 2012
  5. Doe v. SundquistTennessee Supreme Court · 1999

64 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API