Legal Opinion

Smith v. Weinberger

District Court, E.D. Michigan

Decided April 25, 1974No. Civ. A. 39476PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

MEMORANDUM OPINION

HARVEY, District Judge.

This is an action pursuant to Section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U. S.C. Section 405(g), for judicial review of a final decision of the Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare which affirms prior administrative determinations applying the “workmen’s compensation offset” provisions of Section 224 of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C.A. Section 424a, against the disability insurance benefits to which the plaintiff is entitled (Section 223 of the Act, 42 U.S.C.A. Section 423), and against the wife’s and the child’s insurance benefits…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Dandridge v. WilliamsSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
  2. Richardson v. BelcherSupreme Court of the United States · 1971
  3. Wehmeier v. W. E. Wood Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1966
  4. Barber Lofty v. Elliott L. Richardson, Secretary of Health, Education and Welfare,defendant-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1971
  5. Lofty v. CohenDistrict Court, E.D. Michigan · 1970

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Richard A. Kananen v. David Matthews, Secretary of Health, Education, and WelfareCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1977
  2. Soper v. St. Regis Paper Co.Supreme Judicial Court of Maine · 1980
  3. Smith v. WeinbergerCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API