Legal Opinion

Scribner v. Doseman

Michigan Supreme Court

Decided July 9, 1858PublishedCited by 1 opinion

Error to Kent Circuit.

1Opinion of the Court

The Coubt held that, in all cases of special motions, notice must be given if the opposite party has appeared in the cause. A plaintiff in error is always in court, and always entitled to notice. Where he does not prosecute his writ by attorney, he is entitled to have notice served upon himself in the manner provided by the Rules. Defendant in error is only entitled to such notice after having appeared.

2Cited by1 opinion

  1. White v. Commissioners of Multnomah CountyOregon Supreme Court · 1886