Forster v. State

ADKINS, J.,

concurring and dissenting, in which BATTAGLIA, J., joins.

I concur with the Majority’s judgment, in the sense that I agree Nancy S. Forster should not prevail in her appeal, but I disagree that her appeal should be dismissed on grounds she failed to exhaust administrative remedies. I would affirm the Circuit Court on the grounds used in its decision — that Forster has not stated a claim for wrongful discharge.

Although the Majority devotes much attention to Forster’s notice argument, it gives short shrift to her statutory interpretation argument. Forster contends that Maryland Code…