Legal Opinion

Continental Western Insurance Co. v. Stenstrom

Court of Appeals of Iowa

Decided January 28, 1998No. 96-1043Published

1Opinion of the Court

VOGEL, Judge.

Doris and Albert Stenstrom and Stenstrom Construction Company, Inc. (“Strenstroms”) appeal the district court’s declaratory judgment and summary judgment rulings denying their underinsured motorists (“UIM”) claim under defendant corporation’s insurance policy with plaintiff insurer, Continental Western Insurance Company (“Continental”), for injuries employee, Doris Stenstrom (“Doris”), received as a pedestrian. Because we find Doris was not covered under the company’s UIM policy, we affirm both district court rulings.

Background facts. Doris is both an employee and shareholder of…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Rau v. Liberty Mutual InsuranceCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1978
  2. Hartford Accident & Indemnity Co. v. BookerCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 1976
  3. National Union Fire Insurance v. OlsonHawaii Supreme Court · 1988
  4. Ciha v. IronsSupreme Court of Iowa · 1993
  5. Lopez v. StateWyoming Supreme Court · 1978

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API